USPTO serial 79028737
ZLATOPRAMEN ANNO 1642 TRADICNÍ BOHÉMIA PIVO KRÁSNÉ BREZNO VICHNI SLÁDEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZLATOPRAMEN ANNO 1642 TRADICNÍ BOHÉMIA PIVO KRÁSNÉ BREZNO VICHNI SLÁDEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
Robert C. Faber Ostrolenk, Faber Gerb & Soffen, LLP1180 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DRINKS UNION, a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by Heineken Ceská respublika, a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by DRINKS UNION, a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by DRINKS UNION, a.s.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ZLATOPRAMEN ANNO 1642 TRADICNÍ BOHÉMIA PIVO KRÁSNÉ BREZNO VICHNI SLÁDEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |