Drawing for AAC CAPITAL PARTNERS

USPTO serial 79028755

AAC CAPITAL PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359955Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AAC CAPITAL PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035[ Business consultancy and information; assistance and consultancy relating to the fields of business planning, business management, and business organization; business investigations, evaluations, expert appraisals, information and research projects; collecting and processing of business and financial information and data for the composition and drafting of statistics and indices; business studies and business reports; economic forecasts and analysis for business purposes; market analysis, market research and market studies for business purpose. ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036Private Equity investment management; completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities and equities in support of Private Equity investment management; investment of capital and funds; financing and loans in support of Private Equity investment management; financial management in the field of Private Equities; financial management and operation of collective investment undertakings, namely Limited Partnerships; financial consultancy and information services with regard to Private Equities; consultancy with regard to financial analysis, policy and organization of Private Equities and Limited Partnerships; economic forecasts and analysis for financial purposes; market analyses, market research and market studies for financial purposes.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 9, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 27, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 25, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 15, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 15, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 30, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 24, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance