USPTO serial 79028760
KEYKEG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3344445Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEYKEG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Den Helder, NL
NL-1786 PR Den Helder, NL
NL-1786 PR Den Helder, NL
NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.1010 Lake Street, Suite 400OAK PARK, IL 60301-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Packaging and packing material namely, packaging containers of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Packaging and packing material made of cardboard and paper, namely, cardboard boxes and containers for packaging | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | [ Packaging and packing material, namely, packaging containers of rubber ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eurokeg B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Eurokeg B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Eurokeg B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Eurokeg B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named KEYKEG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |