USPTO serial 79028778
MOBISTAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBISTAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L. CLARK
Jeffrey L. Clark Wood, Phillips, Katz, Clark & Mortimer500 West Madison StreetSuite 3800Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for communication devices; computer game software and programs enabling user to play games with mobile phones; electronic multiplayer and multiuser computer game programs and software; computer software and programs enabling users of communication devices to simultaneously access databases and global computer networks; software enabling transfer of data between mobile communication apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Paper articles, namely, printed visuals in the nature of promotional material, printed advertising signs and advertising inserts used with folders and binders, newsletters in the field of computer games which can be played with mobile phones, advertising pamphlets, posters, stationery, note pads, printed paper signs, banners and stickers | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing and headgear, namely caps and t-shirts | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of virtual reality games | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services; software design and consultancy services; information technology and Internet consultancy services; development of computer and virtual gaming programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Forest Interactive Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Forest Interactive Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MOBISTAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |