Drawing for AAA GRADE PUNCH EQUIPMENT

USPTO serial 79028790

AAA GRADE PUNCH EQUIPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318676Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AAA GRADE PUNCH EQUIPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

David L. Sigalow Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.255 South Orange AvenueSuite 1401Orlando, FL 32801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Sporting goods including equipment for boxing and martial arts, namely boxing gloves, mitts, focus pads and boxing bagsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 18, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance