Drawing for CASTELLO DI POMINO MARCHESI DE FRESCOBALDI

USPTO serial 79028791

CASTELLO DI POMINO MARCHESI DE FRESCOBALDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3427022Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 13, 2008
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASTELLO DI POMINO MARCHESI DE FRESCOBALDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecelia M. Perry

Cecelia M. Perry McGlew and Tuttle, P.C.Scarborough StationSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 31, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 17, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 13, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance