Drawing for BONDFLEX

USPTO serial 79028792

BONDFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONDFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Abrading instruments for metal, namely abrasives grinding wheels (hand-operated tools), apparatus (hand-operated) for grinding, diamond tools for grinding for hand-operated tools, disc shaped rotating grinding tools for use with hand-operated tools, emery grinding wheel, grinding tools, (hand operated) grinding wheel (hand tools), hand operated grindstone cleaners, grindstones (hand tools), hand-operated tools for use in grinding, tools (hand-operated) for grindingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 12, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 8, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance