USPTO serial 79028795
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Galis
Mark R. Galis Greenberg Traurig, LLP77 W. Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | common metals and their alloys, namely, steel and its alloys, brass and its alloys, copper and its alloys, titanium and its alloys; building materials of metal, namely, metal soffits, metal cladding; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; metal ironmongery and small items of metal hardware for locksmithing applications, namely, pins, deadbolts, lock rings and keys, metal strap-hinges and closures for doors, windows and viewing windows for use in industrial machinery; metal screws, metal nuts, metal bolts, metal plugs, metal snap rings, metal clamping plates, metal cotter pins and ball lock pins, threaded metal rods, metal fastening inserts, namely, metal concrete inserts, metal expansion shields, metal wedge anchors, metal drilling anchors and metal safety anchors, metal expansion shields, metal frame fixings in the nature of brackets and anchors, metal cavity fixings in the nature of brackets, metal toggle plugs, metal wall plugs, metal clamps, metal beam clips, metal rope clips, metal chain shackles, metal gate hooks, metal u-bolts, metal hose clamps, metal washers for spacing or securement of fasteners, metal screws, metal nuts, metal bolts, metal plugs, metal push-in caps for tubing ends, metal snap rings, metal clamping plates, metal cotter lock pins, threaded metal rods, metal pegs, nails, metal rivets, metal cramps, wires, metal pegs, nails, metal wattle for use in building construction, wire mesh, metal brake cable and fence tensioners, binding screws of metal for cables; metal crank handles in the form of bars and non-plasticized rings, metal chains, metal split pins, belt tensioners of metal, plastic-coated, zinc-coated metal poles in pipe form; plastic-coated metal garden doors, metal pipes, metal flanges and bushings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | hand-operated tools and implements, namely, saws, shears, wrenches, putty knives, drills, general purpose hand grinders, axes, chisels, dies, hammers, shovels, pliers, scissors, punches, pipe cutters, rasps, reamers, scrapers, sharpening wheels, socket wrenches, socket spanners and squares; gardening tools, namely, earth drills, prune saws, rakes, and spades | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | non-metallic fastening materials, namely, non-metallic strap hinges, non-metal screws, non-metal nuts, non-metal bolts, non-metal plugs in the nature of fillings for holes or openings, non-metal snap rings, non-metal clamping plates, non-metal cotter pins and ball lock pins, non-metal and non-paper closures for doors, windows and for use in securing latches in industrial machinery; binding screws not of metal for cables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |