USPTO serial 79028801
FASHION DKF DONKAWA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASHION DKF DONKAWA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Cotton clothing, knitwear, denim clothing, leather clothing, casual wear, sports wear, bathing suits, beach clothes, underwear, undershirts, undershorts, brassieres, underskirts, camisoles, bodices, dressing gowns, coats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, waistcoats, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pullovers, cardigans, sweaters, blouses, shorts, bermuda shorts; socks, stockings, footwear, namely shoes, boots, slippers, sport shoes, footwear uppers, soles for footwear, heel pieces for shoes; headgear, namely berets, caps; babies' diapers of textile, babies' napkins of textile, babies' pants; suspenders, sarongs, collars, bandanas, garters, belts, neckties, bow ties, foulards, muffs, gloves, shawls, headbands, scarves, wristbands | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |