USPTO serial 79028846
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH
CH-8052 Zürich, CH
CH-8052 Zürich, CH
CH-6855 Stabio, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, preserved meat, meat extracts, charcuterie, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game; salami, ham, cooked ham and mortadella; preserved meat, namely, terrines, and spreads, namely, cheese spreads, fruit-based spreads, garlic-based spreads, meat-based spreads, fish-based spreads; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; oils and fats for foods; foods made with preserved mushroom and soy products, namely, soy-based food bars, soy-based snack foods; prepared dishes, namely, beef patties, beef stock, crab cakes, croquettes made of chicken, meat and fish, fish cake, fish mousse, instant or pre-cooked soup, meat-based mousse, meat extract, meat juice, meat paste, sandwiches spread; salads made of meat, charcuterie, fish, shellfish, seafood and poultry; snacks, namely, dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, snack dips, potato-based snack foods, vegetable-based snack foods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Pasta; cereal-based products, namely, bagels, bread and buns, corn fritters, crepes, croissants, pretzels, wholemeal bread; snacks, namely, corn chips, corn-based snack foods, crackers, grain-based chips, panini, rice crackers, sesame sticks, pizzas, rice, processed corn, sandwiches, sauces, spices, meat pies, pies, prepared dishes, namely, fish sandwiches, French toast, hoagies, lasagna, macaroni salad, meat pies, polenta, hamburger sandwiches, frankfurter sandwiches | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |