Drawing for PROCTOR

USPTO serial 79028865

PROCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3427023Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 13, 2008
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PROCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Conveyor dryers for the food, chemical, pharmaceutical and tobacco processing industries; belt conveyors; industrial drying machinery, namely, machinery for drying fabrics, foods, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, natural fibers, synthetic fibers, tobacco, wood, veneer, textiles, leather, hay, charcoal briquettes, scouring pads, ceramics, vegetables and rubber; industrial heat treating and curing machinery, namely, machinery for heat treating and curing textiles, rubber, hosiery, and synthetic products; garnett machinesACTIVE—
011Propane gas, natural gas or butane gas roasting machines; industrial roasters for coffee beans, nuts, and seeds; heat recovery apparatus, namely, finned heat exchangers for recovering and processing waste heat from process exhaust air streams; industrial baking ovens for the food industry; industrial incinerators; industrial gaseous fluid dryers and ovens; liquefied gas type ovens for food or beverage processing; industrial food and beverage processing machines and apparatus, namely, grills, melters, toasters, coolers; puffers, namely, industrial cooking ovens for puffing food productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 18, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 14, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 19, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 19, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 5, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance