Drawing for ECO POWERSTAR

USPTO serial 79028875

ECO POWERSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO POWERSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Fuels (including motor fuels); rape oil for industrial purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Components, devices and apparatuses for fuel reduction when operating motors (parts of motors)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Components, devices and apparatuses for fuel reduction (fuel economisers); heat accumulatorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance