USPTO serial 79028885
ENDURA ELITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3395062Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2008
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENDURA ELITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanagawa-ken 214-0021, JP
Kanagawa-ken 214-0021, JP
Kanagawa-ken 214-0021, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Kubovcik
Ronald J. Kubovcik Kubovcik & Kubovcik900 17th Street, N.W.Suite 710Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric batteries for video cameras for the broadcast and video industry, chargers with electric discharge function for batteries of a video camera, chargers for batteries of other types, meters of state of charge of electric batteries, meters of state of residual-capacity of electric batteries, storage containers for batteries of a video camera, power supply adapters for chargers, cinematographic machines, electric or magnetic meters and testers, receivers of electronic audio signals, receivers of electronic video signals, transmitters of electronic audio signals, transmitters of electronic video signals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |