USPTO serial 79028945
RELYABALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3312861Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELYABALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. SEURYNCK
John P. Seurynck Dickinson Wright PLLC2600 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 300Troy, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Playground balls; playing balls for games; sports balls; gymnastic balls | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |