USPTO serial 79028964
WENXING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3268626Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WENXING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T Wang
Timothy T Wang Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500Dallas, TX 75231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Tools for machines, namely, reamers, milling machines, metal cutting machines, key duplicator machines[, packaging machines, smoothing presses, printing presses, mucilage glue machines, machines for pouring plastics, rotary printing presses and labeler machines] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 24, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |