Drawing for PROCTOR

USPTO serial 79028971

PROCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3409307Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 8, 2008
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PROCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, web processing equipment used in connection with continuous webs of paper, textiles, packaging materials; conveyor dryers for the food, chemical, pharmaceutical and tobacco processing industries; belt conveyors; industrial drying machinery, namely, machinery for drying fabrics, foods, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, natural fibers, synthetic fibers, tobacco, wood, veneer, textiles, leather, hay, charcoal briquettes, scouring pads, ceramics, vegetables and rubber; industrial heat treating and curing machinery, namely, machinery for heat treating and curing textiles, rubber, hosiery, and synthetic products; garnett machinesACTIVE—
011Propane gas, natural gas or butane gas roasting machines; industrial roasters for coffee beans, nuts, and seeds; heat recovery apparatus, namely, finned heat exchangers for recovering and processing waste heat from process exhaust air streams; industrial baking ovens for the food industry; industrial incinerators; industrial gaseous fluid dryers and ovens; liquefied gas type ovens for food or beverage processing; industrial food and beverage processing machines and apparatus, namely, grills, melters, toasters, puffers, namely, industrial cooking ovens for puffing food products, coolersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 19, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 10, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 11, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Oct 11, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 27, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2008CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 15, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 14, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 3, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance