Drawing for XFLOW

USPTO serial 79028982

XFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3302920Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen S. Simpson, Esq.

Ellen S. Simpson, Esq. Simpson & Simpson, PLLC5555 Main StreetWilliamsville, NY 14221UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating appliances, namely, industrial furnaces; industrial burners for solid, liquid and/or gaseous fuels, self-recuperative industrial burners for solid, liquid and/or gaseous fuels, duct burners, multifuel burners, and dual fuel burners, all for boiler and drier firing for the purpose of heating industrial furnaces; radiant tubes for industrial furnaces, single ended radiant tubes for industrial furnaces, parts of the aforementioned productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 9, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 7, 2011LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 29, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance