Drawing for ATIKA

USPTO serial 79029015

ATIKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3348781Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2007
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATIKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Siegmar Pohl

Siegmar Pohl Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP44 Montgomery Street, Ste 400San Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Prefabricated buildings, transportable buildings; all of the aforesaid goods of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Prefabricated buildings, transportable buildings; all of the aforesaid goods not of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Building constructionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Architectural designSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 25, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance