Drawing for INNOVATORS IN TILE DESIGN

USPTO serial 79029022

INNOVATORS IN TILE DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3409310Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 8, 2008
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATORS IN TILE DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN P. MURTAUGH

JOHN P. MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 EAST 9TH STREETSUITE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Tiles, not of metal, for building; tile flooring, not of metal; sandstone for building; wainscotting, not of metal; non-metal mosaics for building; glazed porcelain tilesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 28, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 9, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance