Drawing for EUROPEAN NAILFACTORY

USPTO serial 79029050

EUROPEAN NAILFACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340262Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EUROPEAN NAILFACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas S. Birney

Thomas S. Birney DORR, CARSON & BIRNEY, P.C.5299 DTC Blvd., Suite 340Greenwood Village, CO 80111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Finger nail cosmetics, in particular nail enamels, nail glitter, nail stickers, nail piercing, nail care preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Finger nail files, finger nail scissorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Portable electronic heating devices, in particular a heating device for the curing and hardening of UV gel finger nail systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Brushes for cosmetic purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 7, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 21, 2012CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED—
May 16, 2012ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 28, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance