Drawing for Serial No. 79029052

USPTO serial 79029052

Serial No. 79029052

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79029052?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical products and implements, including cards of plastic, for the removal of wood ticks and stings in connection with bee stingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Surgical implements and instruments, including cards of plastic, for the removal of wood ticks and stings in connection with bee stingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising for others in connection with goods and services; sales promotion (for others)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance