USPTO serial 79029073
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa
Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007-5109| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Extruded plastic in the form of [ bars, blocks, pellets, rods, ] sheets, films [ and tubes ] for use in manufacture; plastic film other than for packaging that is printed, surface textured, tinted, laminated or reflective for flat lamination and profile wrapping for store fixtures, office furniture, living room furniture, bathroom furniture, kitchen furniture, bedroom furniture, and interior design, including walls, ceilings, doors, door frames, five-piece doors, windows, window sills, and stairs; films designed for the three-dimensional lamination of routed medium density fiberboards (MDF) as part of furniture, shop counters, and customer counters, films for coating building materials in the form of profiles, ridges, panels, timbers, planks, pipes, stakes, panes, gates, doors, windows, window sills, stairs, partition walls, all made from wood, metal, plastic and other materials; plastic film other than for packaging that is printed, surface textured, tinted, laminated or reflective used to wrap lighting battens, molding and mill work for ornamental facings in kitchens and all types of profiles and strips, wrap laminate drawer sides, films for the surface lamination of furniture panels, films in solid colours as well as wood and abstract designs used in the production of kitchen unit doors, bathroom panels and bathroom furniture fronts, bedroom and domestic furniture, office furniture and shop fittings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | [ Building materials made from plastics, namely, profiles, ridges, panels, timbers, planks, pipes, stakes, panes, gates, doors, windows, window sills, stairs, partition walls ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Fitted plastic film furniture covers for use in decorating furniture ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |