Drawing for RENOLIT DESIGN

USPTO serial 79029073

RENOLIT DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3654810Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 14, 2009
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENOLIT DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa

Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007-5109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Extruded plastic in the form of [ bars, blocks, pellets, rods, ] sheets, films [ and tubes ] for use in manufacture; plastic film other than for packaging that is printed, surface textured, tinted, laminated or reflective for flat lamination and profile wrapping for store fixtures, office furniture, living room furniture, bathroom furniture, kitchen furniture, bedroom furniture, and interior design, including walls, ceilings, doors, door frames, five-piece doors, windows, window sills, and stairs; films designed for the three-dimensional lamination of routed medium density fiberboards (MDF) as part of furniture, shop counters, and customer counters, films for coating building materials in the form of profiles, ridges, panels, timbers, planks, pipes, stakes, panes, gates, doors, windows, window sills, stairs, partition walls, all made from wood, metal, plastic and other materials; plastic film other than for packaging that is printed, surface textured, tinted, laminated or reflective used to wrap lighting battens, molding and mill work for ornamental facings in kitchens and all types of profiles and strips, wrap laminate drawer sides, films for the surface lamination of furniture panels, films in solid colours as well as wood and abstract designs used in the production of kitchen unit doors, bathroom panels and bathroom furniture fronts, bedroom and domestic furniture, office furniture and shop fittingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019[ Building materials made from plastics, namely, profiles, ridges, panels, timbers, planks, pipes, stakes, panes, gates, doors, windows, window sills, stairs, partition walls ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020[ Fitted plastic film furniture covers for use in decorating furniture ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 5, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 7, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 21, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 17, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 17, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 29, 2016PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Jan 29, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 10, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance