Drawing for BIOSTARCH

USPTO serial 79029078

BIOSTARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOSTARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016compostable films for packaging and wrapping of dry goods, moist goods, refrigerated goods for domestic, retail, wholesale, industrial, transport and storage purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 26, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance