Drawing for SINETROL

USPTO serial 79029079

SINETROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3376180Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2008
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINETROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S EGBERT

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices412 Main St., 7th FloorHouston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Non-medical dietetic substance in the nature of a citrus fruit extracts mixture for burning fat, namely, fruit purees and peels used as ingredients of foodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 21, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 30, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 5, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 5, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 17, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 6, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance