Drawing for ASTURVA

USPTO serial 79029095

ASTURVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3382085Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2008
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASTURVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline H. Mead

Caroline H. Mead Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.One Maritime PlazaSuite 300San Francisco, CA 94111-3492

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of neurological and mental diseases; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of the symptoms of Parkinson's diseases, epilepsy, migraine and multiple sclerosisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 3, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 21, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 19, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance