USPTO serial 79029104
ABSORBEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABSORBEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTEL EMERSON
CHRISTEL EMERSON HENKEL OF AMERICA, INC.2200 RENAISSANCE BLVDTHE TRIAD, SUITE 200GULPH MILLS, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations for absorbing humidity and odours | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Cleaning tissues, namely dusters, wipes, floor cloths and dish cloths, impregnated with compounds and not impregnated with compounds, with the ability to absorb humidity and odors, all for household and kitchen use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |