Drawing for Serial No. 79029126

USPTO serial 79029126

Serial No. 79029126

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3524301Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 28, 2008
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79029126?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz, Esquire

Robert B.G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical disc drives, optical magnetic disc drives, magnetic disc drives, personal computers; television sets, liquid crystal display television sets, plasma display panel television sets, projection television sets, digital versatile disc players, digital versatile disc recorders, compact disc players, compact disc recorders, video cameras, digital cameras; consumer video game machines for use with televisionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 24, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 4, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 29, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance