USPTO serial 79029148
NETTRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3389108Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2008
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETTRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-75008 PARIS, FR
F-75008 PARIS, FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus, equipment and devices for data, information or signal processing, transmission and reception, namely, computer hardware, signal processors and associated computer software all for supervising, controlling and operating a railway network | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL LUCENT
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Rail GTS France SAS
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NETTRAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 26, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |