Drawing for REISENTHEL

USPTO serial 79029222

REISENTHEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423074Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with REISENTHEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine F. Hoffman

Catherine F. Hoffman Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell, & Berkowitz, PC200 East Broward Blvd, Suite 2000Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Office requisites, namely, [ memorandum boards, ] file boxes for storage of business and personal records, file pockets, [ file trays, and file folders; ] and photo storage boxesACTIVE—
018[ Leather and imitation leather bags, ] suitcases, wallets, and purses; all-purpose carrying bags; carry-all bags; shopping bags made of textiles; wine bags for carrying and holding wine; Traveling bags; UmbrellasACTIVE—
020Furniture, namely, [ room and office partitions, drawers, chairs, seats, ] coat racks [ and wardrobes; coat hangers; plastic boxes ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 4, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 2, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 6, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 3, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Sep 3, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance