Drawing for BAMBERGER HOFBRÄU

USPTO serial 79029232

BAMBERGER HOFBRÄU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389111Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAMBERGER HOFBRÄU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

NEIL F. GREENBLUM GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACERESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers, mineral water, aerated water and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, vegetable juices, lemonades; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for the production of the foregoing beverages; concentrated malt syrup for beverages; concentrated malt wortSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Technological consultancy for malt and beer production, chemical and microbiological laboratory services, laboratory research in the field of executing chemical, microbiological and biological experiments ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 22, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 28, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 10, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 11, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 11, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 201471.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 11, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jan 29, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 27, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 27, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance