Drawing for SKIN DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 79029288

SKIN DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280217Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKIN DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic products for men for various parts of the human body, namely, perfumed creams, [ beauty serums, beauty milks, ] beauty lotions [, skin tonics, beauty masks, beauty gels, scrubbing and exfoliating creams and gels, perfumes, eaux de toilette, eau-de-Cologne ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 5, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 27, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 4, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 3, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 16, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 16, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 14, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 2, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 2, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 31, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 31, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Aug 14, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance