USPTO serial 79029312
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie R. Fenstermaker
Julie R. Fenstermaker Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP200 Public SquareSuite 2300Cleveland, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for IT systems, namely, systems analysis, anomaly detection and security software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer systems analysis, advice and event management, all relating to anomaly detection, analysis and reporting; consultation and advice in the field of computer and electronic communication security relating to computer systems threat management, mitigation, prevention and avoidance; computer software consultation, advice, development and design, all relating to anomaly detection, analysis, reporting, systems threat management, mitigation, prevention and avoidance | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |