Drawing for HUNTSMAN

USPTO serial 79029312

HUNTSMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3402012Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 25, 2008
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HUNTSMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie R. Fenstermaker

Julie R. Fenstermaker Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP200 Public SquareSuite 2300Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for IT systems, namely, systems analysis, anomaly detection and security softwareACTIVE—
042Computer systems analysis, advice and event management, all relating to anomaly detection, analysis and reporting; consultation and advice in the field of computer and electronic communication security relating to computer systems threat management, mitigation, prevention and avoidance; computer software consultation, advice, development and design, all relating to anomaly detection, analysis, reporting, systems threat management, mitigation, prevention and avoidanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 7, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 5, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 15, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 19, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 19, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 17, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 15, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance