USPTO serial 79029315
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines and mechanical agricultural elements for distribution of material, for fertilisation, for seeding, for pest control, for soil working, for reaping or for sweeping; parts of the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic regulating, controlling and monitoring means, apparatus and instruments or on-board computers as parts, or as accessory of the aforementioned agricultural machines or mechanical agricultural implements | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |