USPTO serial 79029346
LI'L PEOPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LI'L PEOPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Barcelona, ES
Barcelona, ES
Barcelona, ES
Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
Laurel V. Dineff Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shirts, jackets; footwear; headwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anne Karnbrock
- Other trademarks owned by Anne Karnbrock
- Other trademarks owned by Gary Mcleod
- Other trademarks owned by Gary Mcleod
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LI'L PEOPLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |