Drawing for AGCELENCE

USPTO serial 79029356

AGCELENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGCELENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; especially plant fortifying preparations and surfactants, plant growth regulating preparationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Pesticides, especially preparations for destroying vermin, fungicides, herbicides, insecticidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products as well as grains and cereals not included in other classes; seeds; foodstuffs for animalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Agriculture, horticulture and forestry servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 17, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance