USPTO serial 79029425
BOYSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOYSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Goods of common metal, namely goods of common metal for use with aircrafts and aircraft parts made of common metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Aircrafts and structural parts therefor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Rubber; rubber for use in the manufacture of aircrafts and aircraft parts; rubber goods used for aircrafts and aircraft parts made of rubber; plastics in extruded form for general industrial use; packing materials, namely packing materials for aircrafts and aircraft parts;rubber stoppers; insulating materials, namely insulating materials for aircrafts and aircraft parts; flexible pipes, not of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |