Drawing for X-431

USPTO serial 79029432

X-431

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-431?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Diagnostic computers for vehicle breakdown; data processing apparatus, namely data processors; computers; computer peripheral devices, namely computer peripherals; time recording devices; punched card machines for offices; electronic notice boards; semi-conductors; telephone apparatus; optical goods, namely optical lensesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 29, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Mar 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance