Drawing for HEMA

USPTO serial 79029471

HEMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324896Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with HEMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2520New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machines for products; packing machines; crimping machines, namely atmospheric and vacuum seaming machines for metal containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 2, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 4, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance