Drawing for SPF

USPTO serial 79029493

SPF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Banner

ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K STREET, NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025READY-MADE CLOTHING FOR WOMEN, MEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, BLOUSES, DRESS SHIRTS, TIES, SUSPENDERS, DRESS SUITS, SUITS, DRESSES, BELTS, SKIRTS; SHOES, NOT ORTHOPEDIC SHOES, NOT DESIGNED OR TREATED FOR SUN PROTECTIONSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 9, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 24, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2008RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 17, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 24, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance