USPTO serial 79029541
C.B. SHOES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C.B. SHOES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
53545 Linz, DE
53545 Linz, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, ORTHOPEDIC INSERTS, ORTHOPEDIC SHOES AND OTHER ORTHOPEDIC FOOTWEAR, IN PARTICULAR ORTHOPEDIC INSOLES AND SHAPED SOLES IN THE FORM OF SOLID PLASTIC INSERTS WITH FOOT BEDS OR ANATOMICALLY SHAPED DEEP FOOT BEDS, OF NATURAL CORK, THERMAL CORK, PLASTIC, LATEX OR FOAMED PLASTIC MATERIALS, INCLUDING BEING ELASTIC COMPOUNDS OF CORK-LATEX OR PLASTIC-CORK MIXTURES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER BAGS, SUITCASES, WALLETS, BILLFOLDS, CASES, KEY CHAINS, CASES FOR KEYS, HANDBAGS, BRIEFCASES, PURSES; BAGS, NAMELY, ALL PURPOSE CARRYING BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, HANDBAGS, KEY BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS,TRAVEL BAGS, BEACH BAGS, WAIST BAGS, SADDLE BAGS; GRIP SACKS, HIP SACKS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS; SADDLERY, SADDLERY OF LEATHER | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | FOOTWEAR AND PARTS THEREFOR INCLUDED IN THIS CLASS, INCLUDING SPORTS FOOTWEAR AND CASUAL FOOTWEAR, IN PARTICULAR SPORTS SHOES AND CASUAL SHOES, COMFORTABLE SHOES, SHOES WITH ANATOMICALLY SHAPED FOOT BEDS, WORK SHOES; BOOTS, LOW SHOES, SHOES, SANDALS, CHILDREN'S SANDALS, GYMNASTIC SANDALS, OPEN-TOED SANDALS, BACKLESS SLIPPERS, SLIPPERS, SANDALS WITH HEEL STRAPS AND CLOGS, INCLUDING SUCH GOODS WITH ANATOMICALLY SHAPED DEEP FOOT BEDS; FOOT PADS AND SHOE INSERTS, INSERTS TO PROTECT THE PRESSURE-SENSITIVE POINTS OF THE FOOT, FOOT SUPPORTS,FITTED PARTS, HEEL CUPS, WEDGES, PADS, INSOLES, HEELS, SOLES, PARTS OF SHOE BOTTOMS, FOOT BEDS AND SHAPED SOLES AND PARTS THEREFOR, INCLUDING SHAPED SOLES AND FOOT BEDS IN THE FORM OF SOLID PLASTIC INSERTS WITH FOOT BEDS OR ANATOMICALLY SHAPED DEEP FOOT BEDS, IN PARTICULAR OF NATURAL CORK, THERMAL CORK, PLASTIC, LATEX OR FOAMED PLASTIC MATERIALS, INCLUDING ALSO ELASTIC COMPOUNDS OF CORK-LATEX OR PLASTIC-CORK MIXTURES; PARTS FOR SHOE UPPERS, ALL FOR PRIMARILY NON-ORTHOPEDIC PURPOSES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |