Drawing for CRYOPOLE SWISS

USPTO serial 79029579

CRYOPOLE SWISS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3344464Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2007
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYOPOLE SWISS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff Wilson Keadjian Browndorf LLP114 W. Forty Seventh Street - 18th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cryogenic pumps and structural components therefor for handling fluids for fixed or mobile installations, namely piston pumps, centrifugal pumps and their structural components and accessories, namely piston or centrifugal pumps driven by electrical motor for cryogenic fluids transfer to be installed on fixed or mobile installations, all the above products of Swiss originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Atmospheric and electrical vaporizers used for converting cryogenic liquids into gases, all the above products of Swiss originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 26, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 9, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 4, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance