Drawing for PROX-CHEM

USPTO serial 79029602

PROX-CHEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3369582Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROX-CHEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn E. Knecht

Carolyn E. Knecht IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Rd.Suite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in industry, science, photography, as well as agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed artificial resins for textile, paper, adhesives, coating, leather, inks, constructions; unprocessed plastics; fertilizers; [ fire extinguishing compositions; ] chemical products for the fresh-keeping and preserving of food; tanning agents for use in the manufacture of leather; adhesives used in industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2021IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 15, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 23, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 8, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 28, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance