Drawing for CMI LEAN AGILITY.

USPTO serial 79029644

CMI LEAN AGILITY.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488785Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CMI LEAN AGILITY.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. William McLaughlin

F WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMER500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CITIGROUP CENTERCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Multidisciplinary advice services for business organization and management; business evaluation, market analysis and inventory control in the field of business organization and management of various organizations; business management advisory services; consulting services in the field of human resources development, namely, for the promotion of employee career growth for employees and employers; personnel consultancy in the field of professional reintegration; business management, personnel management, and business change management advice; consulting services in the fields of interim management and personnel recruitment and selection; company business strategy development; business management; administrative services, namely, administrative accounting and business administration consultancy; accounting services, namely, composition preparation and control of annual accounts; business organization and management consulting services; business consulting in the field of founding of companies; accounting; business information and advice in connection with the aforesaid services; business information; market study, research and analysis; market opinion polling; advice for business organization and managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 7, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 14, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2008RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance