USPTO serial 79029645
ARAFLOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3453919Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARAFLOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntsman Advanced Materials; (Europe) BVBA
BE
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials; (Europe) BVBA
Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan D. Adams
Bryan D. Adams Huntsman International, LLC.10003 Woodloch Forest DriveHuntsman - Legal DepartmentThe Woodlands, TX 77380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed artificial resins and plastics, namely, epoxy, polyurethane and polyester resins; curing agents to be used in conjunction with artificial and synthetic resins for the manufacture of clear coats, enamels and primers; compositions of curing agents and artificial resins for the manufacture of clear coats, enamels and primers in industry; adhesives for general industrial purposes; unprocessed polystyrene resins; styrene monomers for industrial use; epoxy resins, unprocessed | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Paints, varnishes, lacquers; enamel paints; rust preservatives; wood preservatives; raw natural resins for use in the manufacture of resin and for general industrial use; thinners for lacquers and paints; paints to be used on floors; epoxy based paints | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials; (Europe) BVBA
- Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named ARAFLOOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |