Drawing for DOLCE GUSTO

USPTO serial 79029676

DOLCE GUSTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283297Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DOLCE GUSTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tiffany D.W. Shimada

Tiffany D.W. Shimada Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household containers made of glass, porcelain or earthenware [ ; glass dishes; porcelain dishes; earthenware dishes; steel wool for cleaning ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 21, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 3, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 25, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 25, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 21, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 21, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 17, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 16, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance