Drawing for MARZOCCHI

USPTO serial 79029706

MARZOCCHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARZOCCHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bicycles and motorcycles parts, namely forks, frames, handlebars, saddle seats, gears, brakes, wheels, shock absorbers; bicycles and mountain bikesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 25, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 17, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 2, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance