Drawing for RIEGL

USPTO serial 79029708

RIEGL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIEGL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Range finders, laser range finders, speed meters, in particular laser speed meters, level meters, distance meters for vehicles and crane systems, survey measurement devices, in particular for surveying tunnels, caverns and containers in particular for molten metals; 2D laser scanners, 3D laser scanners, airborne laser scanner, as well as software therefore, forestry measurement systems, alarm systems, meteorological measurement devices, telescopes, in particular telescopic sights, photographic devices, hard- and software for docking systems for vehicles, in particular for aircrafts and ships, for navigation systems, for environmental surveillance systems, for traffic supervision systems, for aiming devices and fire control systems as well as video- and television systems; components and parts of the aforementioned devices and systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Research and technological services, design of hard- and/or software regarding the devices and systems of the aforementioned class 9SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 19, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance