USPTO serial 79029720
3P RESINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445367Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3P RESINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TALIVALDIS CEPURITIS
TALIVALDIS CEPURITIS OLSON & CEPURITIS LTD20 NORTH WACKER DRIVE36TH FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed artificial resins for composites | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |