USPTO serial 79029722
C 3 P
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C 3 P?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92200 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FR
F-92200 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY CATHERINE MERZ
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, PC1140 Lake StreetSuite 304Oak Park, IL 60301-1051Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | women's and men's cosmetic products for the face, eyes, lips, teeth, hair, neck, bust, body, hands, feet and nails, namely, beauty creams, beauty serums, beauty milks, beauty lotions, toning lotions, beauty masks, beauty gels, cosmetic oils, make-up removing milks, make-up removing rinses, perfumery in the nature of perfume extracts, toilet soaps; scrubbing and exfoliating products, namely, body scrubs, facial scrubs and exfoliant creams; powders, namely, body powder and face powder; talcum powders; make-up products for the face and body; scented products, namely, perfumes, eaux de toilette, eau-de-Cologne, deodorants for personal use; hair care products, namely, hair lotions and shampoos; non-medicated bath and shower preparations; refreshing aerosols for skin care, namely, water in atomized containers used to produce a moisturizing and protective effect; moisturizing products, namely, skin moisturizer, moisturizing milks, tonics and lotions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |