USPTO serial 79029768
AIRSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3458180Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thame, Oxfordshire, GB
Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG4 0TY, GB
Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG4 0TY, GB
Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG4 0TY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Smoke and fire detection apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus and instruments for use in the detection of particulate products of combustion, comprising detectors of particulate products of combustion, aspirators, filters for particles, sampling pipes, exhaust pipes, alarms and controls, parts and fittings therefore, all for use in protecting industrial, commercial, and residential premises and their occupants against smoke and fire | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Installation, maintenance and repair services in relation to smoke detection apparatus and instruments, fire detection apparatus and instruments, and aspirating smoke detection apparatus and instruments ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kidde Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by AIRSENSE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AIRSENSE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AIRSENSE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named AIRSENSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |